<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The fallout of the Debian OpenSSL security problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.penz.name/66/the-fallout-of-the-debian-openssl-security-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.penz.name/66/the-fallout-of-the-debian-openssl-security-problem/</link>
	<description>About Linux, IT security,tips and tricks and otherstuff that comes into my mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:57:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Firestein steals blog posts &#124; Robert Penz Blog</title>
		<link>http://robert.penz.name/66/the-fallout-of-the-debian-openssl-security-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Firestein steals blog posts &#124; Robert Penz Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 09:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.penz.name/?p=66#comment-688</guid>
		<description>[...] are 100% identical even the links to my previous posts are there. &#8220;&#8230;. .I’ve written previously (and also here)&#8220;. But he is not only copying from me. I copies from many other security [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are 100% identical even the links to my previous posts are there. &#8220;&#8230;. .I’ve written previously (and also here)&#8220;. But he is not only copying from me. I copies from many other security [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All SSL Sites are fake-able with new real world MD5 collision attack [Update] &#124; Roy Firestein</title>
		<link>http://robert.penz.name/66/the-fallout-of-the-debian-openssl-security-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>All SSL Sites are fake-able with new real world MD5 collision attack [Update] &#124; Roy Firestein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 03:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.penz.name/?p=66#comment-686</guid>
		<description>[...] report which hash functions they use. And there is still the revoke list problem, I’ve written previously (and also [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] report which hash functions they use. And there is still the revoke list problem, I’ve written previously (and also [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All SSL Sites are fake-able with new real world MD5 collision attack &#124; Robert Penz Blog</title>
		<link>http://robert.penz.name/66/the-fallout-of-the-debian-openssl-security-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>All SSL Sites are fake-able with new real world MD5 collision attack &#124; Robert Penz Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.penz.name/?p=66#comment-683</guid>
		<description>[...] which hash functions they use. And there is still the revoke list problem, I&#8217;ve written previously (and also here).  In IT Security [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which hash functions they use. And there is still the revoke list problem, I&#8217;ve written previously (and also here).  In IT Security [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Penz Blog &#187; DNS based revoke lists</title>
		<link>http://robert.penz.name/66/the-fallout-of-the-debian-openssl-security-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Penz Blog &#187; DNS based revoke lists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 13:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.penz.name/?p=66#comment-277</guid>
		<description>[...] just thought about the scaling problem of the SSL revoke lists, I wrote in my last blog post.  The first two solutions that came into mind where peer-to-peer or DNS based ones. Peer-to-peer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just thought about the scaling problem of the SSL revoke lists, I wrote in my last blog post.  The first two solutions that came into mind where peer-to-peer or DNS based ones. Peer-to-peer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

