<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No SWAP Partition, Journaling Filesystems, &#8230; on a SSD?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.penz.name/137/no-swap-partition-journaling-filesystem-on-a-ssd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.penz.name/137/no-swap-partition-journaling-filesystem-on-a-ssd/</link>
	<description>About Linux, IT security,tips and tricks and otherstuff that comes into my mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:57:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://robert.penz.name/137/no-swap-partition-journaling-filesystem-on-a-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.penz.name/?p=137#comment-984</guid>
		<description>@SV: Thats not possible as all modern SSDs have a chip for wear leveling - take a look at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wear_leveling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SV: Thats not possible as all modern SSDs have a chip for wear leveling &#8211; take a look at:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wear_leveling" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wear_leveling</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SV</title>
		<link>http://robert.penz.name/137/no-swap-partition-journaling-filesystem-on-a-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-982</link>
		<dc:creator>SV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.penz.name/?p=137#comment-982</guid>
		<description>The thing is,

the calculations with the SSD failing in 8 seconds are unfortunately possible even with the newest SSDs.
32nm Flash has the life of approx 20k cycles and uses considerably big sizes.
Unless one properly utilizes TRIM and uses an optimized OS for a SSD, one can go bad in less than a week (my experience with cheap MLC non-SandForce 64G OCZ and Corsair SSDs).
All you need is a program that uses block based access to the SSD and &quot;touches&quot; the same block many times per second (in my case a ionode benchmark).
And the SSD went 5 feet under REALLY fast. Just sharing my 2 cnts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is,</p>
<p>the calculations with the SSD failing in 8 seconds are unfortunately possible even with the newest SSDs.<br />
32nm Flash has the life of approx 20k cycles and uses considerably big sizes.<br />
Unless one properly utilizes TRIM and uses an optimized OS for a SSD, one can go bad in less than a week (my experience with cheap MLC non-SandForce 64G OCZ and Corsair SSDs).<br />
All you need is a program that uses block based access to the SSD and &#8220;touches&#8221; the same block many times per second (in my case a ionode benchmark).<br />
And the SSD went 5 feet under REALLY fast. Just sharing my 2 cnts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ppetrov</title>
		<link>http://robert.penz.name/137/no-swap-partition-journaling-filesystem-on-a-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-967</link>
		<dc:creator>ppetrov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 23:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.penz.name/?p=137#comment-967</guid>
		<description>BRILIANT!

GJ you deserve a mythbuster badge!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRILIANT!</p>
<p>GJ you deserve a mythbuster badge!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Choosing an SSD &#171; hblok.net - Linux, Electronics and Tech</title>
		<link>http://robert.penz.name/137/no-swap-partition-journaling-filesystem-on-a-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>Choosing an SSD &#171; hblok.net - Linux, Electronics and Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 21:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.penz.name/?p=137#comment-900</guid>
		<description>[...] Robert Penz goes into details to bust some of the myths around SSD. He concludes that on a normal user system, you don&#8217;t need to take special consideration when switching from spinning to solid drives. Only on the advice of using &#8220;noatime&#8221; he seems incorrect, challenged by this thread: &#8220;noatime is not necessary. Fedora defaults to relatime , which is a better choice: it reduces disk access almost as much as noatime, but preserves enough atime info for practical purposes&#8221;.  tags: Corsair, ext4, Fedora, ssd, TRIM     older &#187;  Panorama &#187;    No Responses to &quot;Choosing an SSD&quot;. Add a comment? or Follow comments by RSS?  Be the first and share your thoughts! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Robert Penz goes into details to bust some of the myths around SSD. He concludes that on a normal user system, you don&#8217;t need to take special consideration when switching from spinning to solid drives. Only on the advice of using &#8220;noatime&#8221; he seems incorrect, challenged by this thread: &#8220;noatime is not necessary. Fedora defaults to relatime , which is a better choice: it reduces disk access almost as much as noatime, but preserves enough atime info for practical purposes&#8221;.  tags: Corsair, ext4, Fedora, ssd, TRIM     older &raquo;  Panorama &raquo;    No Responses to &quot;Choosing an SSD&quot;. Add a comment? or Follow comments by RSS?  Be the first and share your thoughts! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rex</title>
		<link>http://robert.penz.name/137/no-swap-partition-journaling-filesystem-on-a-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.penz.name/?p=137#comment-889</guid>
		<description>i would like my grand children to have my usb/ssd with all my data in it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like my grand children to have my usb/ssd with all my data in it <img src='http://robert.penz.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romania</title>
		<link>http://robert.penz.name/137/no-swap-partition-journaling-filesystem-on-a-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>Romania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.penz.name/?p=137#comment-869</guid>
		<description>********************************
&gt; 100,000 write cycles

 Worst possible scenario:
&gt;
&gt; 50 MB/s writes / 4 KB/block-write = 12,800 block-writes per second
&gt; 100,000 writes life cycle / 12,800 writes per second = 7.8 SECONDS before failure
************************************
???  i don&#039;t understand this math; you divide number of writes with # blocks and you get seconds?! 
so again... writes per blocks means time?

your case is that: w speed of 50mb/s equals 12800 blocks writen/s, or 1 w cycle/12800 blocks in a second. presuming all ssd size is 50mb, one has to write on it 100000 times (@ 1 cycle/s) or 27,7 hours of writes second by second in the same place...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>********************************<br />
&gt; 100,000 write cycles</p>
<p> Worst possible scenario:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; 50 MB/s writes / 4 KB/block-write = 12,800 block-writes per second<br />
&gt; 100,000 writes life cycle / 12,800 writes per second = 7.8 SECONDS before failure<br />
************************************<br />
???  i don&#8217;t understand this math; you divide number of writes with # blocks and you get seconds?!<br />
so again&#8230; writes per blocks means time?</p>
<p>your case is that: w speed of 50mb/s equals 12800 blocks writen/s, or 1 w cycle/12800 blocks in a second. presuming all ssd size is 50mb, one has to write on it 100000 times (@ 1 cycle/s) or 27,7 hours of writes second by second in the same place&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Installing Ubuntu 10.04 Server on a USB Stick &#124; Stochastic Bytes</title>
		<link>http://robert.penz.name/137/no-swap-partition-journaling-filesystem-on-a-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Installing Ubuntu 10.04 Server on a USB Stick &#124; Stochastic Bytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.penz.name/?p=137#comment-827</guid>
		<description>[...] Some people think that using a journaling filesystem will prematurely wear a USB stick, but this guy doesn’t think so. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some people think that using a journaling filesystem will prematurely wear a USB stick, but this guy doesn’t think so. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cane</title>
		<link>http://robert.penz.name/137/no-swap-partition-journaling-filesystem-on-a-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 07:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.penz.name/?p=137#comment-806</guid>
		<description>I ordered Patriot SSD (http://www.patriotmemory.com/products/detailp.jsp?prodline=8&amp;catid=21&amp;prodgroupid=141&amp;id=911&amp;type=17) - manufacturer gives 10 years warranty for this disk. Do we really need to worry about data stored on such SSD more than on ordinary HD? I don&#039;t think so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ordered Patriot SSD (<a href="http://www.patriotmemory.com/products/detailp.jsp?prodline=8&#038;catid=21&#038;prodgroupid=141&#038;id=911&#038;type=17" rel="nofollow">http://www.patriotmemory.com/products/detailp.jsp?prodline=8&#038;catid=21&#038;prodgroupid=141&#038;id=911&#038;type=17</a>) &#8211; manufacturer gives 10 years warranty for this disk. Do we really need to worry about data stored on such SSD more than on ordinary HD? I don&#8217;t think so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marius Gedminas</title>
		<link>http://robert.penz.name/137/no-swap-partition-journaling-filesystem-on-a-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>Marius Gedminas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.penz.name/?p=137#comment-805</guid>
		<description>Some anecdotic data: the 16 GB SSD in my Asus EeePC 900 died in under a year, with read errors in the spot that used to contain the ext3 journal.

I suspect poor write leveling and decided to go with ext2 in the replacement drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some anecdotic data: the 16 GB SSD in my Asus EeePC 900 died in under a year, with read errors in the spot that used to contain the ext3 journal.</p>
<p>I suspect poor write leveling and decided to go with ext2 in the replacement drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SSD recommendations? - Hardware Canucks</title>
		<link>http://robert.penz.name/137/no-swap-partition-journaling-filesystem-on-a-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>SSD recommendations? - Hardware Canucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.penz.name/?p=137#comment-801</guid>
		<description>[...] boring or familiar, just complex. I&#039;m researching it myself. This was my jump-off point: No SWAP Partition, Journaling Filesystems, &#8230; on a SSD? &#124; Robert Penz Blog  Still reading...    __________________  &quot;On a clear drive, you can seek forever.&quot; (HP-UX [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] boring or familiar, just complex. I&#39;m researching it myself. This was my jump-off point: No SWAP Partition, Journaling Filesystems, &#8230; on a SSD? | Robert Penz Blog  Still reading&#8230;    __________________  &quot;On a clear drive, you can seek forever.&quot; (HP-UX [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

